Performance Technical Future Evolution
Summary
Source-signaled extension points separated from confirmed implementation.
Audience
Engineers, architects, QA, support, security reviewers, and operators working with the Performance module.
Overview
The source contains explicit extension points and modeled-but-unreached states. This page records them as future candidates, not current commitments.
Confirmed implementation
- Cycle phase states exist without phase-advance commands.
- Appraisal closure exists in the aggregate without a direct command or cycle cascade.
- A processed-event ledger exists for future inbound subscription use, but no Performance consumer is registered.
- Compatibility code and preserved identifiers support migration rather than the target canonical model.
- Rating finalization contracts permit future downstream use, but no promotion or Payroll consumer is confirmed.
Classification
Foundation future evolution; none of these items is promised behavior.
Requires confirmation
Roadmap, sequencing, ownership, deprecation policy, and target architecture require confirmation.
Related Articles
See Also
Keywords
- Performance service
- Future Evolution
- Draft technical documentation
Source References
microservices/src/performance-service/Domain/Common/Enums.csmicroservices/src/performance-service/Domain/Appraisal/Appraisal.csmicroservices/src/performance-service/Application/Compatibility/PerformanceCompatService.csmicroservices/src/performance-service/Infrastructure/PerformanceDbContext.cs
Revision Information
- Status: Draft
- Last reviewed: 2026-07-16
- Review cycle: Quarterly